cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
III) Within the Model of the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed on the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of at some point during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness in the alleged event plus the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't react in the least on the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak type of evidence which may be manoeuvred from the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other over a motorcycle at four.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted for the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of the accused has not been conducted yet. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to get advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image with the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity from the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for that witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated images. In addition to, the images shown within the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity till he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures with the accused publically, either by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or software, would create doubt while in the proceedings of the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there isn't any likelihood for that witness to begin to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Presented the reasons elaborated earlier mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
Section 302 of the PPC deals with among the most major offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this website post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, take a look at the punishment it involves, and analyze some notable case laws related to this particular section.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could potentially pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long run public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is actually a right to life itself.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 with the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of such person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”
after release from the prison he shed interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station due to potential health risks and dangers.
Using keywords effectively is likewise crucial. Take into account using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Furthermore, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and a hundred and twenty with the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
14. While in the light with the position explained over, it really is concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his get more info retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more